Top Guidelines Of copy of case law judgments in 2013
Top Guidelines Of copy of case law judgments in 2013
Blog Article
“There is not any ocular evidence to show that Muhammad Abbas was murdered by any in the present petitioners. Mere fact that Noor Muhammad and Muhammad Din observed firstly the deceased and after a long way they noticed the petitioners going towards the same direction, didn't indicate that the petitioners were chasing the deceased or were accompanying him. This kind of evidence cannot be treated as evidence of previous viewed.
In other circumstances as discussed supra pensionary benefits cannot be stopped on account of criminal charges after the retirement of two years; and, is violative on the regulation laid down via the Supreme Court during the case of Haji Muhammad Ismail Memon, PLD 2007 SC 35. So, the competent authority of the parent department in the petitioner plus the Chief Secretary, Sindh, are liable to release the pensionary amount on the petitioner and pay back the pension amount and other ancillary benefits towards the petitioner to which he is entitled under the legislation within two months from the date of receipt of this order. The competent authority from the respondent is also directed to recalculate the pensionary benefits with the petitioner and increases accrued thereon the withheld pensionary benefits with effect from stopping to date. Read more
Capital Punishment: Section 302 PPC supplies with the death penalty since the primary form of punishment for intentional murder. The offender may very well be sentenced to death as retribution for taking the life of another human being unlawfully.
competent authority and if any appeal or representation is filed the same shall be decided(Promotion)
The said recovery could possibly be used, within the most, for corroboration in the main evidence, but by itself it cannot be a basis for conviction. They further submitted that the petitioners Bhoora and Mst. Mubeena Bibi also pointed out the place of incidence. The reported memo of pointation is irrelevant and inadmissible as practically nothing was discovered on account of this sort of pointation. The place of event plus the place of throwing the dead body were already in the knowledge of witnesses before their pointation through the petitioners. Reliance can be placed on case legislation titled as “Ijaz Ahmad and Another v. The State” (1997 SCMR 1279) wherein it has been held through the august Supreme Court of Pakistan more info as under:
Section 302 of your PPC deals with one of many most critical offenses in criminal regulation: murder. In this website post, we will delve into the provisions of Section 302, investigate the punishment it entails, and assess some notable case laws related to this particular section.
be proven without an iota of doubt in all other jurisdictions) will be inferred. This is usually a horrifying reality, an especially lower threshold for an offence that carries capital punishment.
In any society, the enforcement of law and order is essential to maintain peace and protect its citizens. Among the most significant crimes that can disrupt this harmony is murder. In Pakistan, Section 302 with the Pakistan Penal Code (PPC) deals with the punishment for murder, and its enforcement is critical to guarantee justice prevails.
Civil Courts keep jurisdiction over title disputes in partition matters. Agreement to sell does not confer title; it involves legal transfer of title. Agreement to sell must be manufactured and properly exhibited in evidence. Declining relief based on an unproduced and un-exhibited sale agreement is legally unsustainable. Read more
I) The above mentioned referred case FIR, for your murder of deceased namely Muhammad Sajjad, was registered on the complaint of Muhammad Sharif son of Ghulam Farid that is father with the petitioner and as per Tale of FIR, the petitioner is really an eyewkness from the occurrence.
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
13309-B of 2010 to get weak types of evidence plus the evidentiary value whereof would be observed with the time with the trial. The investigation of this case has already been finalized and, Hence, confirmed custody with the petitioner in jail is not going to provide any valuable purpose at this stage.”
Finding reliable free case law sites may be challenging. Several websites need subscriptions or offer limited information. This article helps you navigate the landscape of free case law resources in Pakistan, providing you with a curated list of reliable and accessible platforms.